Filter Specialty
Filterspecialty
Submit To The Journals
Previous
Article
Next
Article

72/The feasibility of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in nonagenarians using solely cephalic access

European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2019;5(Suppl. 1):abstr72

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) can reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular impairment and dyssynchrony. Elderly patients receiving CRT are less often studied. CRT implantation in elderly patients can be technically demanding and pose extra challenges. They may tolerate lengthy procedures less well and may be more severely affected by pneumothoraces. The use of solely cephalic access is associated with a lower pneumothorax rate, but this route is not conventionally used due to concerns regarding technical difficulty and the size of the vein. These concerns are exacerbated in elderly patients.

Aim: To evaluate whether CRT implantation, particularly using solely cephalic access, is safe, practical and efficient in a nonagenarian population

Methods: Retrospective database analysis of procedural data from all CRT procedures performed from the beginning of September 2009 to the end of September 2017 in three pacing centres (St. George’s Hospital, London; St. Peter’s Hospital, Chertsey; Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford).

Results: Thirty-five patients aged 90 or older underwent CRT implantation during the study period. Procedure duration was not available for two patients. Mean age was 92. Twenty (57.1%) were male. Thirty-three patients received a CRT-P device (94.3%) and two received CRT-D (5.7%). One patient subsequently underwent AV node ablation.

CRT implantation was successful in 100% of patients. All procedures had been performed with the intention of implanting all leads via the cephalic vein, and this was achieved in 26 procedures (74.3%). Mean procedure time was 108.5 minutes and mean fluoroscopy time was 14.73 minutes. The majority of procedures (66.7%) of procedures were completed in less than two hours. No complications were noted in any patient.

Conclusions: CRT implantation was safe in a small series of nonagenarian patients. The use of cephalic access for implantation of all leads is achievable and can be performed in a timely manner in the majority of nonagenarian patients. Cephalic access should be used as the primary route of access for CRT implantation in elderly patients.

 

  • Touch Medical Media Limited, trading as Touch Medical Media, is a private limited company registered in England and Wales at The White House, Mill Road, Goring, Reading, England, RG8 9DD with registered number 08197142. © 2019 All rights reserved.

    touchcardio is for informational purposes and intended for healthcare professionals only. Its content should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations.