Diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease represents major challenges to our health care system, affecting millions of patients each year. Until recently, the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was possible only through cardiac catheterization and invasive coronary angiography. To avoid the risks of an invasive procedure, stress testing is often employed for an initial assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease, serving as a gatekeeper for cardiac catheterization. With the emergence of noninvasive coronary angiography, the question arises if such a strategy is still sensible, particularly, in view of only a modest agreement between stress testing results and the presence of coronary artery disease established by cardiac catheterization. Much data in support of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of non-invasive coronary angiography by computed tomography have emerged within the last few years. These data challenge the role of stress testing as the initial imaging modality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. This article reviews the clinical utility, limitations, as well as the hazards of stress testing compared with non-invasive coronary artery imaging by computed tomography. Finally, the implications of this review are discussed in relation to clinical practice.
CT angiography, stress testing, cardiac CT, coronary artery disease.
Armin Arbab-Zadeh, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St/Blalock 524, Baltimore, MD 21287-0409, USA. Tel. +1.410.502.0549 – Fax: +1.443.287.6624. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Share this Article
Related Content In Heart Failure
Explaining Sex Differences in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Outcome
European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2020;6(1):17-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EJAE.2020.6.1.17
Over the past years, several reports have drawn attention to the need to consider sex-specific differences in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Most importantly, there is growing concern on the underrepresentation of women in CRT landmark trials which laid the foundation for present guidelines. Patients with symptomatic heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% […]
Quantification of Seasonal Variation in Daily Physical Activity in Individuals with Heart Failure and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator/Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Devices
Heart International. 2019;13(2):31–7
In individuals with heart failure (HF) who also have implanted cardioverter defibrillators and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (ICD/CRT) devices, low daily physical activity (PA) levels lead to increased risk of mortality, poor aerobic capacity and lower health-related quality of life.1 Improving daily PA in these individuals may, therefore, be an important clinical endpoint; however, designing interventional […]
Normalised Heart Rate Variability After Sacubitril/Valsartan
European Journal of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology. 2019;5(1):60-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17925/EJAE.2019.5.1.60
We report the case of a 44-year-old woman with a history of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II). In 2010, she had a myocardial infarction with thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, alleged in the context of an essential thrombocythaemia. […]
Journal articles and more to your inbox
Get the latest clinical insights from touchCARDIOSign me up!